Submitted a suggestion but the confirmation said not all are read, so I'm posting here too...
I have a multisite set up. All three domains are essentially the same sites but translated into English (dewandelaar.org), Dutch (dewandelaar.nl) and German (derwanderer.de). To save space in images on the server, I only upload images to .ORG. When creating a repeating image field in .NL and .DE I copy the URL from the .ORG site and change the domain-name part as appropriate. For example;
hidden link
hidden link
hidden link
The new implementation only has a short URL field edit box, the former implementation extended full width. The new, short, editing field makes it difficult to edit the url. I notice that using keyboard shift-left-arrow selects toward the right, shift-right-arrow selects toward the left. Both are opposite direction to what is expected.
I use 16:9 size images. The area for displaying the image is now a square, however my images are tiling over each other in the .ORG site. The image should be scaled to fit the confines of the square boundary, preferably not being cropped - as it was in the previous implementation.
On my .NL and .DE websites (admin), the tiling displays the full-size image, which extends outside the repeating field area and covers the custom fields I have below it making them (almost) unusable. I guess the issue is because I am using images that exist outside the media library - again, to save limited space on the server.
The front-end result can be seen on the following urls. The front-end appears fine, but I'd prefer the back end to revert to the original implementation. The 3.3 implementation seems purely cosmetic and with limited testing.
hidden link
hidden link
hidden link
Hello,
Thanks for the details, I don't see existed option I have escalated this issue, to check if it is a valid feature request or usability issue.
Here is the update:
This issue has been forward to our developers as a feature request, but there isn't any ETA for it, so I am not sure when will be implemented into Types plugin.
Your Types developer got back to me directly and explained the situation. Some issues are known and will be addressed in a future update. The service was quick and professional, so thank you.