"I am not familiar with the software you use and we would need to have some details on how this is supposed to work.
If you mean a mechanism that notifies you when a client submits a form with not enough data or wrong data, will not be added to CRED through any other 3rd party I think, because CRED does that already."
Zapier (similar to IFTTT) is an integration tool between services. So it takes information captured in one system (e.g. CRED, Gravity Forms, WP Forms, etc.) and pipes it to another system (e.g. a CRM like ActiveCampaign) in an automated way.
"if you mean notification on when the form is abandoned, this requires a lot of details on "how it should work".
it has. lot of options on how something like that should or could work.
If you have a vision on how this could work, please let us know so I can connect this to the eventual request."
Yep, the GravityForms and WPForms links in the post spoke to that behavior.
"These are massive developments that we want to do, CRED must receive such updates to survive.
Times of HTML/PHP forms are over, and user-side systems take over.
This is something we will do, and I assume that things will get much smoother with CRED in future"
Thank you for recognizing this, Beda. Yes, for CRED to be a serious contender in the Forms space, it really needs to step up it's game, and do so quickly.
Gravity Forms & WPForms has so many useful _business_ features that I'm hoping the CRED team takes them seriously. As it stands, even though I'm a Toolset user... I plan to use GF or WPF just because of how much better it will _solve_ my pain points.
This isn't a knock on CRED because I want to see it make great progress in being able to compete and lead with the top Form builders out there.
But imagine how many people are evaluating CRED as a viable form builder, seeing how difficult it is to work with it from a UX/UI/workflow POV, not understanding how the solution can solve their problems... Then NOT offering any feedback, and just going off to a competitor.
As a business owner, my main goal isn't to mess around with the tech. I have too many other competing priorities that I need to focus on that if CRED can quickly and easily solve problems I need to solve with my Forms in a painless way, I'll be sharing how great CRED is with everyone I know.
And to be honest... CRED could probably be better than GF or WPForms because it's unique in that it's part of a suite of tools within the Toolset eco-system. That is it's biggest strength and the team should really take advantage of this solid base & foundation -- I imagine you could do a lot of interesting advanced capabilities by cross-leveraging the power of Types / Views / Layouts / WPML / etc. without degrading loading speed or performance.
Lastly, I made a quick video highlighting UX/UI gaps through the Toolset experience (and not just with the plugin, even with the exchange on this forum! ?)
hidden link
Hopefully, you can help bring a renewed energy to improving the culture of the team/company on focusing more UX/UI/design/ease of use from _end user_ perspectives. Thanks for considering my feedback.
Conclusion:
- Look to the leading Form builders / solutions to understand why they're doing what they're doing, such as:
-- hidden link -- their base design isn't amazing, but their form building UX is _incredible_!!!
-- hidden link
-- hidden link (these are the same guys behind hidden link, an incredibly useful business tool, and they _understand_ design/UX)
-- hidden link (pay attention to top features)
- Create and improve a seamless and user-friendly Design/UI/UX/workflow experience from the End User perspective (and not the developers)
- Add features that solve _business/end user_ problems
- Lead by coming up with innovative new features to stay ahead of the competition
Best,