I found this:
hidden link
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8347595/htaccess-how-to-force-the-clients-browser-to-clear-the-cache
hidden link
Seems it is not possible to force a browser to forget the cache, but seems there are workarounds to it.
However, what confuses me is why the cache should actually show something broken, if that is not what you set.
It should, logically, keep displaying that working version (that is the only I could cache imagine to do)
Then, slowly the caches re-update and you'd eventually see a (which we confirmed is not) broken Map.
The other way around does not make sense to me, why would the cache be showing a broken content if it worked?
However, we are as well playing with Google Maps stuff here, so I am really not sure how Cache interacts with site cache and browser caching on the server or plugin level.
Usually I do suggest to not cache Toolset things as we already include such mechanisms
Read more here:
https://toolset.com/documentation/user-guides/front-page-filters/how-to-use-views-parametric-search-on-large-sites/
https://toolset.com/forums/topic/can-toolset-can-handle-a-big-db/#post-379949
https://toolset.com/faq/working-with-caching-plugins/
https://toolset.com/documentation/user-guides/display-on-google-maps/#data-caching
https://toolset.com/documentation/user-guides/data-caching-for-google-maps-addresses/
So, it is usually not only overkill to cache a Toolset site, but moreover creates issues and I have seen several sites being less performant due to this.
I would like to - if confirmed - be sure the issue is not related to Toolset.
For this, of you can replicate this or have some steps on how to, I could try to replicate such a scenario, but it'll cost some time as it'll require remote caching I suppose, and I cannot do that locally.
Please let me know about this, I do not want to close this with a "it's fine but..." feeling
If there is an issue in Maps we want to solve that, but it is tricky to figure out from what I have and know, if this is really a Maps issue.
I suspect, not, since there are already several cache mechanisms that I would need to exclude from a debug process.
It could however as well be an incompatibility.
Please can you let me know if you hav detailed steps to replicate this or even have a copy of such a (slimmed down) site?
When we can confirm a bug we'll solve it.