Skip Navigation

[Resolved] Import Values Into Custom Fields for Intermediary Posts

This support ticket is created 4 years, 10 months ago. There's a good chance that you are reading advice that it now obsolete.

This is the technical support forum for Toolset - a suite of plugins for developing WordPress sites without writing PHP.

Everyone can read this forum, but only Toolset clients can post in it. Toolset support works 6 days per week, 19 hours per day.

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
- 10:00 – 13:00 10:00 – 13:00 10:00 – 13:00 10:00 – 13:00 10:00 – 13:00 -
- 14:00 – 18:00 14:00 – 18:00 14:00 – 18:00 14:00 – 18:00 14:00 – 18:00 -

Supporter timezone: Asia/Kolkata (GMT+05:30)

This topic contains 2 replies, has 2 voices.

Last updated by Focus on the Family 4 years, 10 months ago.

Assisted by: Minesh.

Author
Posts
#1539837

Hello,
We want to be able to import values into custom fields for Intermediary posts (which connect 2 custom post types with a many-to-many relationship) using WP All Import Pro & The Toolset types add-on. We've not been able to figure it out, and could use some help.

Thank you!
Barney Royalty
Focus on the Family

#1540471

Minesh
Supporter

Languages: English (English )

Timezone: Asia/Kolkata (GMT+05:30)

Hello. Thank you for contacting the Toolset support.

Importing custom fields belongs to intermediary post type using WP All Import plugin is not possible as the feature is not added yet.

If you can check the following Doc - we shared the information about how to import many-to-many relationship:
=> https://toolset.com/documentation/user-guides/export-import/how-to-import-content-into-wordpress-using-csv/how-to-import-data-from-a-csv-file-using-the-wp-all-import-toolset-types-add-on-plugin/post-relationships/#example-3-many-to-many-relationships

Where we already added the note that:

Many-to-many relationships that use the intermediary post type are not supported by the WP All Import plugin. If you need this kind of support please let us know.

You should contact WP All Import support to add this feature.

#1544575

We're working out an alternate solution.