This support ticket is created 6 years ago. There's a good chance that you are reading advice that it now obsolete.
This is the technical support forum for Toolset - a suite of plugins for developing WordPress sites without writing PHP.
Everyone can read this forum, but only Toolset clients can post in it. Toolset support works 6 days per week, 19 hours per day.
No supporters are available to work today on Toolset forum. Feel free to create tickets and we will handle it as soon as we are online. Thank you for your understanding.
[wpv-item index=1]
<tr>
<td>
[wpv-post-body view_template="Loop item in Single Product List Entry"]
</td>
[wpv-item index=other]
<td>
[wpv-post-body view_template="Loop item in Single Product List Entry"]
</td>
[wpv-item index=4]
<td>
[wpv-post-body view_template="Loop item in Single Product List Entry"]
</td>
</tr>
[wpv-item index=pad]
<td></td>
[wpv-item index=pad-last]
<td></td>
</tr>
Ok so I see that you are using a template on the view. This is fine but if you scroll down below the loop editor you should see the content of the template.
Regarding the screenshot showing pagination, I did not create that CSS. The is a screenshot of the pagination that shows at the bottom of the page linked to the category link shown I the screenshot I sent before.
In that post, stated that I did not know how that page was created or how to edit it. BTW: If I can not edit it, I would prefer the link be deactivated.
You may want to split this to another ticket but I have a search form question.
From hidden link I selected "ecollage" from the Category FIeld and "2018" from the Portfolio year and I left the remaining fields blank and submitted the query.
Nothing happened after submitting the form query. It just refreshed the page???
There should be a few dozen Products from that search.
New threads created by Shane and linked to this one are listed below:
I really like and appreciate the issues you have helped me resolve today but I should mention that this is about to merge with a ticket I submitted earlier to Nigel who stepped in for Waqar. My latest post with detailed information can be viewed in my reply #1149313.
I would greatly appreciate help in resolving the issues listed on that ticket as quickly as possible. You seem to have a good understanding of what I am attempting to achieve as long as there is no conflict.
The ticket begins with Waqar and is currently with Nigel. I appreciate the support from both of them but for some reason, their replies seem overly formal technical.