Skip Navigation

[Resolved] Fitlering Search Results (WordPress Archive) with Relevanssi activated

This support ticket is created 5 years, 9 months ago. There's a good chance that you are reading advice that it now obsolete.

This is the technical support forum for Toolset - a suite of plugins for developing WordPress sites without writing PHP.

Everyone can read this forum, but only Toolset clients can post in it. Toolset support works 6 days per week, 19 hours per day.

Our next available supporter will start replying to tickets in about 0.33 hours from now. Thank you for your understanding.

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
- 7:00 – 14:00 7:00 – 14:00 7:00 – 14:00 7:00 – 14:00 7:00 – 14:00 -
- 15:00 – 16:00 15:00 – 16:00 15:00 – 16:00 15:00 – 16:00 15:00 – 16:00 -

Supporter timezone: Europe/London (GMT+00:00)

This topic contains 17 replies, has 2 voices.

Last updated by Thomas AMX 5 years, 3 months ago.

Assisted by: Nigel.

Author
Posts
#1301687

Hello Nigel,

Thank you for coming back to me. I had great hopes after I saw in the changelog that "a number of issues with Relevanssi" were fixed in Views 2.9.

But unfortunately, this issue does not seem to have been fixed. I updated everything, cleared all cache, rebuilt the Relevanssi index - and still the same. Tested on 2 sites, a simplified case produces the same error.

This issue is still open in "Known Issues":

https://toolset.com/known-issues/?wpv_post_search=relevanssi&wpv_aux_current_post_id=399043&wpv_view_count=401205-TCPID399043

Apparently, there are many compatibility issues with Relevanssi (some of which have been resolved, yes, but still Relavanssi and Toolset don't seem to play nicely together). So, sometimes I wished Toolset had some native relevancy tool not relying on third-party products.

Cheers,
Tom

#1306417

Nigel
Supporter

Languages: English (English ) Spanish (Español )

Timezone: Europe/London (GMT+00:00)

Hi Tom

The remaining Relevanssi issues should now be resolved by today's release of Views 2.9.1, if you could please update and re-test.

Thanks for your patience.

#1306969

Indeed, Nigel. As far as I can tell, it works correctly now. In my quick test, both custom fields and taxonomies behaved correctly. Fantastic! Thank you!

Cheers,
Tom