Skip Navigation

[Closed] "Look Up" fields with relational post types.

The Toolset Community Forum is closed, for technical support questions, please head on to our Toolset Professional Support (for paid clients), with any pre-sale or admin question please contact us here.
This support ticket is created 11 years, 5 months ago. There's a good chance that you are reading advice that it now obsolete.
This is the community support forum for Types plugin, which is part of Toolset. Toolset is a suite of plugins for developing WordPress sites without writing PHP.

Everyone can read this forum, but only Toolset clients and people who registered for Types community support can post in it.

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices.

Last updated by Nikos 11 years, 5 months ago.

Assisted by: Nikos.

Author
Posts
#33123

I have just purchased the toolset so I apologize if I am just overlooking this functionality. I'm creating a site that showcases music festivals and using the parent child relationship to add the performers of each festival as children of the festival itself. This is really nice because I can add the artist, the artist music genre, the artist ASIN number, etc all to the festival information. But what I'm realizing is I'm going to be adding the same artist over and over to alot of festivals. I think what I'm looking for is the ability to have my "Add Artist" button actually be a "look up" that searches the existing artist and lets you select and link that artist post with this festival. (obviously having the ability to create a new artist if the one your looking for has not been created). Hopefully that all makes since. Any advice or pointing in the right direction would be appreciated. THANKS.
p.s. This plugin is already the most useful, most benefiting plugin I have ever come across, excellent work!

#33149

Hello Jonathan,

better use taxonomies for artists etc..
Then you can choose from most popular etc..

Hope this helps

The topic ‘[Closed] "Look Up" fields with relational post types.’ is closed to new replies.